The Tahoe (except LS with front bench seat) has a standard front seat center airbag, which deploys between the driver and front passenger, protecting them from injuries caused by striking each other in serious side impacts. The Ascent doesn’t offer front seat center airbags.
The Tahoe has a standard blind spot warning system that uses sensors to alert the driver to objects in the vehicle’s blind spots where the side view mirrors don’t reveal them. Only the Ascent Premium/Onyx/Limited/Touring offers a blind spot warning system.
To help make backing out of a parking space safer, the Tahoe has standard Rear Cross Traffic Alert and Rear Cross Traffic Braking automatically engages the brakes to help avoid a collision. Only the Ascent Premium/Onyx/Limited/Touring offers Rear Cross Traffic Alert and the Ascent’s Rear Cross Traffic Alert does not include automatic braking.
Both the Tahoe and the Ascent have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras and available all wheel drive.
The Chevrolet Tahoe weighs 919 to 1461 pounds more than the Subaru Ascent. The NHTSA advises that heavier vehicles are much safer in collisions than their significantly lighter counterparts.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Chevrolet Tahoe is safer than the Subaru Ascent:
|
Tahoe |
Ascent |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
146 |
190 |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
152/161 lbs. |
159/292 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Chevrolet Tahoe is safer than the Subaru Ascent:
|
Tahoe |
Ascent |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
25 |
37 |
Hip Force |
118 lbs. |
274 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Spine Acceleration |
24 G’s |
27 G’s |
Hip Force |
248 lbs. |
346 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
14 inches |
18 inches |
Spine Acceleration |
38 G’s |
52 G’s |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Chevrolet Tahoe is safer than the Ascent:
|
Tahoe |
Ascent |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Structure |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
17 |
82 |
Neck Tension |
89 lbs. |
178 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
67 lbs. |
89 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Shoulder Deflection |
.31 in |
.83 in |
Shoulder Force |
89 lbs. |
201 lbs. |
Torso Max Deflection |
.43 in |
.98 in |
Torso Deflection Rate |
3 MPH |
6 MPH |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Pelvis Force |
290 lbs. |
915 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
197 |
211 |
Neck Tension |
22 lbs. |
89 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Shoulder Deflection |
.87 in |
1.26 in |
Shoulder Force |
223 lbs. |
357 lbs. |
Torso Max Deflection |
.91 in |
1.18 in |
Torso Deflection Rate |
4 MPH |
9 MPH |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Pelvis Force |
134 lbs. |
201 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |