On the EPA test cycle the 296 GTB running on electricity gets better mileage than the MCPura:
| |
|
|
MPGe |
| 296 GTB |
| |
|
Electric Motor |
45 city/49 hwy |
| |
|
Speciale Electric Motor |
44 city/44 hwy |
| MCPura |
| |
|
|
MPG |
| |
|
3.0 turbo V6 |
15 city/25 hwy |
On the EPA test cycle the 296 GTS running on electricity gets better mileage than the MCPura 3.0 turbo V6 (48 city/48 hwy MPGe vs. 15 city/25 hwy).
The 296 can travel with zero emissions for 7 to 8 miles (dependent on model). The MCPura can’t move without running its internal combustion engine.
The 296 GTS can travel with zero emissions for 7 miles. The MCPura can’t move without running its internal combustion engine.
Regenerative brakes improve the 296’s fuel efficiency by converting inertia back into energy instead of wasting it. The MCPura doesn’t offer a regenerative braking system.
In heavy traffic or at stoplights the 296’s engine automatically turns off when the vehicle is stopped, saving fuel and reducing pollution. The engine is automatically restarted when the driver gets ready to move again. If the conditions warrant or the driver wishes, the system can be manually disabled at any time for the duration of a trip. The MCPura doesn’t offer an automatic engine start/stop system.
The 296 has 1.3 gallons more fuel capacity than the MCPura (17.2 vs. 15.9 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups.