The Outlander has a standard front seat center airbag, which deploys between the driver and front passenger, protecting them from injuries caused by striking each other in serious side impacts. The Grand Cherokee L doesn’t offer front seat center airbags.
With its standard Forward Collision Mitigation with Pedestrian Detection, the Mitsubishi Outlander is better at preventing collisions with pedestrians than the Jeep Grand Cherokee L, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:
|
|
Outlander |
Grand Cherokee L |
| Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
|
|
Crossing Child - DAY |
|
| 12 MPH |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 25 MPH |
AVOIDED |
-11 MPH |
|
|
Crossing Adult - NIGHT |
|
| 12 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 12 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
|
|
Parallel Adult - NIGHT |
|
| 25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 37 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-33 MPH |
| Warning Issued-Brights |
2.3 sec |
2 sec |
| 37 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-28 MPH |
Both the Outlander and the Grand Cherokee L have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, available all wheel drive, lane departure warning systems and around view monitors.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Mitsubishi Outlander is safer than the Grand Cherokee L:
|
|
Outlander |
Grand Cherokee L |
| Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Neck Tension |
201 lbs. |
312 lbs. |
| Torso |
ACCEPTABLE |
ACCEPTABLE |
| Shoulder Deflection |
.71 in |
1.06 in |
| Shoulder Force |
156 lbs. |
178 lbs. |
| Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Neck Compression |
89 lbs. |
134 lbs. |
| Torso |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
| Shoulder Deflection |
.31 in |
1.38 in |
| Shoulder Force |
156 lbs. |
268 lbs. |
| Torso Max Deflection |
.87 in |
1.69 in |
| Torso Deflection Rate |
3 MPH |
11 MPH |
| Pelvis |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
| Pelvis Force |
647 lbs. |
915 lbs. |
| Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |

