The Ascent has standard Whiplash-Reducing Front Seats, which use a specially designed seat to protect the driver and front passenger from whiplash. During a rear-end collision, the Whiplash-Reducing Front Seats system allows the backrest to travel backwards to cushion the occupants and the headrests move forward to prevent neck and spine injuries. The Explorer doesn’t offer a whiplash protection system.
With its standard EyeSight, the Subaru Ascent is better at preventing collisions with pedestrians than the Ford Explorer, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:
|
|
Ascent |
Explorer |
| Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
|
|
Crossing Child - DAY |
|
| 12 MPH |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 25 MPH |
AVOIDED |
-21 MPH |
|
|
Crossing Adult - NIGHT |
|
| 12 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 12 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-17 MPH |
| 25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-2 MPH |
|
|
Parallel Adult - NIGHT |
|
| 25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 37 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-22 MPH |
| Warning Issued-Brights |
3.3 sec |
1.3 sec |
| Warning Issued-Low beams |
1.6 sec |
1.4 sec |
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the Ascent. But it costs extra on the Explorer.
The Subaru Ascent’s rear backup camera has a standard washer for maintaining a clear view under various conditions. In contrast, the Ford Explorer does not offer a rear camera washer, meaning its effectiveness relies on manual cleaning by the user when necessary.
Both the Ascent and the Explorer have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, available around view monitors and driver alert monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Subaru Ascent is safer than the Ford Explorer:
|
|
Ascent |
Explorer |
|
|
Driver |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| Neck Injury Risk |
21% |
29.4% |
| Neck Stress |
229 lbs. |
275 lbs. |
| Neck Compression |
8 lbs. |
13 lbs. |
|
|
Passenger |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
210 |
236 |
| Neck Injury Risk |
33% |
41.4% |
| Leg Forces (l/r) |
35/30 lbs. |
196/281 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Subaru Ascent is safer than the Ford Explorer:
|
|
Ascent |
Explorer |
|
|
Front Seat |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
37 |
65 |
| Chest Movement |
.5 inches |
.9 inches |
| Abdominal Force |
73 lbs. |
161 lbs. |
|
|
Rear Seat |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
81 |
86 |
| Spine Acceleration |
27 G’s |
38 G’s |
| Hip Force |
346 lbs. |
604 lbs. |
|
|
Into Pole |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
149 |
288 |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

