Lithia Auto Stores

Compare the2025 Mazda CX-50VS 2025 Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid

2025 Mazda CX-50
2025 Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid

Safety

The Mazda CX-50 has standard driver and front passenger side knee airbags mounted low on the dashboard. These airbags help prevent the driver and front passenger from sliding under their seatbelts or the main frontal airbags; this keeps them better positioned during a collision for maximum protection. Knee airbags also help keep the legs from striking the dashboard, preventing knee and leg injuries in the case of a serious frontal collision. The Santa Fe Hybrid doesn’t offer a front passenger side knee airbag.

The CX-50 has standard Secondary Collision Reduction System, which automatically apply the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Santa Fe Hybrid doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.

To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the CX-50. But it costs extra on the Santa Fe Hybrid.

Both the CX-50 and the Santa Fe Hybrid have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Mazda CX-50 is safer than the Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid:

CX-50

Santa Fe Hybrid

OVERALL STARS

5 Stars

4 Stars

Driver

STARS

5 Stars

4 Stars

HIC

100

460

Neck Injury Risk

23.2%

28%

Neck Stress

209 lbs.

273 lbs.

Neck Compression

11 lbs.

33 lbs.

Leg Forces (l/r)

222/219 lbs.

290/423 lbs.

Passenger

STARS

5 Stars

4 Stars

HIC

211

369

Chest Compression

.6 inches

.6 inches

Neck Injury Risk

22%

32.5%

Neck Compression

74 lbs.

140 lbs.

Leg Forces (l/r)

264/347 lbs.

726/652 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Mazda CX-50 is safer than the Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid:

CX-50

Santa Fe Hybrid

Front Seat

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

Hip Force

114 lbs.

203 lbs.

Into Pole

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

Max Damage Depth

13 inches

16 inches

Spine Acceleration

28 G’s

38 G’s

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

Reliability

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2024 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Mazda vehicles are more reliable than Hyundai vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Mazda above average in long-term dependability. With 5 more problems per 100 vehicles in the first three years of ownership, Hyundai is rated below average.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ March 2025 Auto Issue reports that Mazda vehicles are more reliable than Hyundai vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Mazda 4 places higher in reliability than Hyundai.

Engine

The CX-50’s optional 2.5 turbo 4-cylinder produces 25 more horsepower (256 vs. 231) and 49 lbs.-ft. more torque (320 vs. 271) than the Santa Fe Hybrid’s 1.6 turbo 4-cylinder hybrid.

As tested in Motor Trend the Mazda CX-50 is faster than the Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid:

CX-50 4 cyl.

CX-50 4 cyl. hybrid gas

Santa Fe Hybrid

Zero to 60 MPH

8.5 sec

7.6 sec

9.8 sec

Quarter Mile

16.5 sec

15.8 sec

17.5 sec

Speed in 1/4 Mile

84.1 MPH

88.6 MPH

82.2 MPH

Fuel Economy and Range

On the EPA test cycle the CX-50 gets better mileage than the Santa Fe Hybrid:

MPG

CX-50

AWD

2.5 4-cyl. Hybrid

39 city/37 hwy

Santa Fe Hybrid

FWD

1.6 turbo 4-cyl. Hybrid

36 city/35 hwy

AWD

1.6 turbo 4-cyl. Hybrid

35 city/34 hwy

An engine control system that can shut down some of the engine’s cylinders helps improve the CX-50 (except Turbo/Hybrid)’s fuel efficiency. The Santa Fe Hybrid doesn’t offer a system that can shut down part of the engine.

Both the CX-50 Turbo/Hybrid and the Santa Fe Hybrid have a standard automatic start/stop engine feature to stop unnecessary fuel waste and pollution at stoplights and heavy traffic. All CX-50 Turbo/Hybrids have a standard disable switch for the system, so a driver can keep the engine from shutting off when the vehicle stops temporarily.

Transmission

The CX-50 has a standard continuously variable transmission (CVT). With no “steps” between gears, it can keep the engine at the most efficient speed for fuel economy, or keep it at its peak horsepower indefinitely for maximum acceleration. The Santa Fe Hybrid doesn’t offer a CVT.

Brakes and Stopping

The CX-50 stops much shorter than the Santa Fe Hybrid:

CX-50

Santa Fe Hybrid

70 to 0 MPH

161 feet

179 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

113 feet

124 feet

Motor Trend

Tires and Wheels

The CX-50 has a standard space-saver spare tire so you can replace a flat tire and drive to have the flat repaired or replaced. A spare tire isn’t available on the Santa Fe Hybrid; it requires you to depend on roadside assistance and your vehicle will have to be towed.

Suspension and Handling

The CX-50 handles at .87 G’s, while the Santa Fe Calligraphy Hybrid AWD pulls only .82 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

The CX-50 2.5 Turbo Premium Plus executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 1.9 seconds quicker than the Santa Fe Calligraphy Hybrid AWD (26.8 seconds @ .63 average G’s vs. 28.7 seconds @ .57 average G’s).

For better maneuverability, the CX-50 Hybrid’s turning circle is 2.5 feet tighter than the Santa Fe Hybrid’s (35.4 feet vs. 37.9 feet). The CX-50’s turning circle is 1.9 feet tighter than the Santa Fe Hybrid’s (36 feet vs. 37.9 feet).

For greater off-road capability the CX-50 Hybrid Preferred has a greater minimum ground clearance than the Santa Fe Hybrid (7.6 vs. 7 inches), allowing the CX-50 to travel over rougher terrain without being stopped or damaged. The CX-50 2.5 S Premium Plus’ minimum ground clearance is 1.6 inches higher than on the Santa Fe Hybrid (8.6 vs. 7 inches).

Chassis

The Mazda CX-50 may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 550 to 700 pounds less than the Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid.

The CX-50 is 4.4 inches shorter than the Santa Fe Hybrid, making the CX-50 easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

Cargo Capacity

The CX-50 has a much larger cargo volume than the Santa Fe Hybrid with its rear seat up (31.4 vs. 14.6 cubic feet).

Towing

Maximum trailer towing in the Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid is limited to 2000 pounds. The CX-50 offers up to a 3500 lbs. towing capacity.

Ergonomics

The CX-50’s front and rear power windows all open or close fully with one touch of the switches, making it more convenient at drive-up windows and toll booths, or when talking with someone outside the car. The Santa Fe Hybrid’s standard rear power window switches have to be held the entire time to open or close them fully.

The CX-50’s rain-sensitive wipers adjust their speed and turn on and off automatically based on the amount of rainfall on the windshield. This allows the driver to concentrate on driving without constantly adjusting the wipers. The Santa Fe Hybrid’s standard manually variable intermittent wipers have to be constantly adjusted.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) conducts detailed tests on headlights for their range both straight ahead and in curves and to be certain they don’t exceed acceptable amounts of glare to oncoming drivers. The CX-50’s headlights were rated “Good” to “Acceptable” by the IIHS, while the Santa Fe Hybrid’s headlights are rated “Acceptable.”

To help drivers see further while navigating curves, the CX-50 Turbo has standard adaptive headlights to illuminate around corners automatically by reading vehicle speed and steering wheel angle. The Santa Fe Hybrid doesn’t offer cornering lights.

The CX-50’s optional rear and side view mirrors have an automatic dimming feature. These mirrors can be set to automatically darken quickly when headlights shine on them, keeping following vehicles from blinding or distracting the driver. The Santa Fe Hybrid offers an automatic rear view mirror, but its side mirrors don’t dim.

Recommendations

Consumer Reports® recommends both the Mazda CX-50 and the Hyundai Santa Fe Hybrid, based on reliability, safety and performance.

Lithia Auto Stores

© 1999 - 2026 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.

Powered by Lithia