For enhanced safety, the front and middle seat shoulder belts of the Toyota Sienna are height-adjustable to accommodate a wide variety of driver and passenger heights. A better fit can prevent injuries and the increased comfort also encourages passengers to buckle up. The Nissan Pathfinder doesn’t offer height-adjustable middle seat belts.
The Sienna has a standard Secondary Collision Brake, which automatically applies the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Pathfinder doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.
Both the Sienna and Pathfinder have Rear Cross Traffic Alert, but the Sienna has Rear Cross Traffic Braking (automatically applies the brakes) to better prevent a collision when backing near traffic. The Pathfinder’s Rear Cross Traffic Alert doesn’t automatically brake.
Both the Sienna and the Pathfinder have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front and rear side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors, available all wheel drive and around view monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Toyota Sienna is safer than the Nissan Pathfinder:
|
Sienna |
Pathfinder |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
175 |
312 |
Chest Compression |
.6 inches |
.6 inches |
Neck Stress |
200 lbs. |
216 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
42 lbs. |
93 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Toyota Sienna is safer than the Nissan Pathfinder:
|
Sienna |
Pathfinder |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
42 |
84 |
Chest Movement |
.5 inches |
.9 inches |
Abdominal Force |
123 lbs. |
138 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
52 |
88 |
Spine Acceleration |
30 G’s |
33 G’s |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
12 inches |
14 inches |
Spine Acceleration |
31 G’s |
37 G’s |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Toyota Sienna is safer than the Pathfinder:
|
Sienna |
Pathfinder |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Structure |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Neck Tension |
201 lbs. |
268 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Shoulder Deflection |
.55 in |
.63 in |
Torso Max Deflection |
.83 in |
.94 in |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
Pelvis Force |
736 lbs. |
1160 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
18 |
65 |
Neck Compression |
22 lbs. |
67 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Torso Max Deflection |
.71 in |
.75 in |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Instrumented handling tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and analysis of its dimensions indicate that the Sienna is 1.5% to 2.8% less likely to roll over than the Pathfinder.