With its standard Active Driving Assistant, the BMW X1 is better at preventing collisions with pedestrians than the Mazda CX-50, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:
|
X1 |
CX-50 |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
|
Crossing Child - DAY |
|
12 MPH |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
25 MPH |
AVOIDED |
-23 MPH |
|
Crossing Adult - NIGHT |
|
12 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-10 MPH |
12 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-11 MPH |
25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-14 MPH |
25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-13 MPH |
|
Parallel Adult - NIGHT |
|
25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-19 MPH |
25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-19 MPH |
37 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-19 MPH |
Warning Issued-Brights |
1.9 sec |
1.5 sec |
37 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-14 MPH |
When descending a steep, off-road slope, the X1’s standard Hill Descent Control allows you to creep down safely. The CX-50 doesn’t offer Hill Descent Control.
To help make backing out of a parking space safer, the X1 has standard Cross Traffic Warning with braking function with automatic braking, systems which detect vehicles approaching from the sides and can automatically apply the brakes to prevent a collision. Only the CX-50 Turbo Premium Plus offers Rear Cross Traffic Braking.
Both the X1 and the CX-50 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, four-wheel antilock brakes, all wheel drive, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, post-collision automatic braking systems, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the BMW X1 is safer than the CX-50:
|
X1 |
CX-50 |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Structure |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
107 |
114 |
Neck Tension |
201 lbs. |
268 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Shoulder Deflection |
.94 in |
1.34 in |
Shoulder Force |
245 lbs. |
357 lbs. |
Torso Max Deflection |
1.1 in |
1.61 in |
Torso Deflection Rate |
7 MPH |
10 MPH |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Pelvis Force |
692 lbs. |
982 lbs. |
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Shoulder Deflection |
.59 in |
.87 in |
Torso Deflection Rate |
5 MPH |
8 MPH |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |