For enhanced safety, the front and rear seat shoulder belts of the Nissan Frontier have pretensioners to tighten the seatbelts and eliminate dangerous slack in the event of a collision and force limiters to limit the pressure the belts will exert on the passengers. The Ford Maverick doesn’t offer pretensioners for its rear seat belts.
The Nissan Frontier has standard driver and front passenger side knee airbags mounted low on the dashboard. These airbags helps prevent the driver and front passenger from sliding under their seatbelts or the main frontal airbags; this keeps them better positioned during a collision for maximum protection. Knee airbags also help keep the legs from striking the dashboard, preventing knee and leg injuries in the case of a serious frontal collision. The Maverick doesn’t offer a front passenger side knee airbag.
The Frontier has standard Active Head Restraints, which use a specially designed headrest to protect the driver and front passenger from whiplash. During a rear-end collision, the Active Head Restraints system moves the headrests forward to prevent neck and spine injuries. The Maverick doesn’t offer a whiplash protection system.
With its standard Automatic Emergency Braking with Pedestrian Detection, the Nissan Frontier is better at preventing collisions with pedestrians than the Ford Maverick, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:
|
Frontier |
Maverick |
Overall Evaluation |
ACCEPTABLE |
MARGINAL |
|
Crossing Child - DAY |
|
12 MPH |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
25 MPH |
AVOIDED |
-24 MPH |
|
Crossing Adult - NIGHT |
|
12 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-11 MPH |
12 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-18 MPH |
25 MPH Low beams |
-19 MPH |
-11 MPH |
|
Parallel Adult - NIGHT |
|
25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-13 MPH |
25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
37 MPH Brights |
-21 MPH |
-8 MPH |
Warning Issued-Brights |
1.6 sec |
1.5 sec |
37 MPH Low beams |
-27 MPH |
-3 MPH |
Warning Issued-Low beams |
1.6 sec |
1.3 sec |
Over 200 people are killed each year when backed over by motor vehicles. The Frontier has standard Rear Automatic Braking that use rear sensors to monitor for objects to the rear and automatically apply the brakes to prevent a collision. The Maverick doesn’t offer backup collision prevention brakes.
The Frontier’s standard lane departure warning system alerts a temporarily inattentive driver when the vehicle begins to leave its lane. A lane departure warning system costs extra on the Maverick.
The Frontier (except S/SV) offers an optional Around View Monitor to allow the driver to see objects all around the vehicle on a screen. The Maverick only offers a rear monitor and rear parking sensors that beep or flash a light. That doesn’t help with obstacles to the front or sides.
To help make backing out of a parking space safer, the Frontier has standard Rear Cross Traffic Alert, helping the driver avoid collisions. Ford charges extra for Cross-Traffic Alert on the Maverick.
Compared to metal, the Frontier’s plastic fuel tank can withstand harder, more intrusive impacts without leaking; this decreases the possibility of fire. The Ford Maverick has a metal gas tank.
Both the Frontier and the Maverick have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, rearview cameras and available four-wheel drive.
The Nissan Frontier weighs 613 to 1365 pounds more than the Ford Maverick. The NHTSA advises that heavier vehicles are much safer in collisions than their significantly lighter counterparts.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Nissan Frontier is safer than the Ford Maverick:
|
Frontier |
Maverick |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
Neck Injury Risk |
32% |
51% |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety does 40 MPH moderate front offset crash tests on new cars. In this updated test, results indicate that the Frontier is much safer than the Maverick:
|
Frontier |
Maverick |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
Structure |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Chest Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Thigh/hip Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Leg/foot Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Restraints |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Rear Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Thigh Rating |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Restraints |
ACCEPTABLE |
MARGINAL |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH, results indicate that the Nissan Frontier is safer than the Ford Maverick:
|
Frontier |
Maverick |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
58 |
87 |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
137 |
174 |
Spine Acceleration |
55 G’s |
57 G’s |
Hip Force |
796 lbs. |
971 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.