With its standard Pre-Collision System with Pedestrian Detection, the Lexus ES is better at preventing collisions with pedestrians than the Nissan Altima, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:
|
ES |
Altima |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
|
Crossing Child - DAY |
|
12 MPH |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
25 MPH |
AVOIDED |
-11 MPH |
|
Crossing Adult - NIGHT |
|
12 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-5 MPH |
12 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-1 MPH |
25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-7 MPH |
25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-5 MPH |
|
Parallel Adult - NIGHT |
|
25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-11 MPH |
25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-5 MPH |
37 MPH Brights |
-34 MPH |
-9 MPH |
Warning Issued-Brights |
2.2 sec |
1.3 sec |
37 MPH Low beams |
-32 MPH |
No Slowing |
Warning Issued-Low beams |
2.1 sec |
No Warning |
The ES has a standard Secondary Collision Brake, which automatically applies the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Altima doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.
Both the ES and Altima have rear cross-traffic warning, but the ES offers optional Rear Cross-Traffic Braking (automatically applies the brakes) to better prevent a collision when backing near traffic. The Altima’s Rear Cross Traffic Alert doesn’t automatically brake.
Both the ES and the Altima have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front and rear side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Lexus ES is safer than the Nissan Altima:
|
ES |
Altima |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
120 |
171 |
Neck Injury Risk |
24% |
30% |
Neck Stress |
239 lbs. |
343 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
30 lbs. |
78 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
Neck Injury Risk |
33% |
54% |
Neck Stress |
159 lbs. |
280 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
62 lbs. |
110 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Lexus ES is safer than the Nissan Altima:
|
ES |
Altima |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
85 |
187 |
Chest Movement |
.6 inches |
1.4 inches |
Abdominal Force |
160 lbs. |
164 lbs. |
Hip Force |
264 lbs. |
511 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Spine Acceleration |
43 G’s |
46 G’s |
Hip Force |
541 lbs. |
544 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
13 inches |
16 inches |
Spine Acceleration |
36 G’s |
42 G’s |
Hip Force |
570 lbs. |
769 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Lexus ES is much safer than the Altima:
|
ES |
Altima |
Overall Evaluation |
ACCEPTABLE |
POOR |
Structure |
ACCEPTABLE |
POOR |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
Head Injury Criterion |
403 |
562 |
Head Peak Forces |
no contact |
109 G’s |
Neck Tension |
312 lbs. |
625 lbs. |
Torso |
ACCEPTABLE |
POOR |
Shoulder Deflection |
1.54 in |
2.09 in |
Shoulder Force |
379 lbs. |
402 lbs. |
Torso Max Deflection |
1.38 in |
2.2 in |
Torso Deflection Rate |
7 MPH |
11 MPH |
Pelvis |
ACCEPTABLE |
POOR |
Pelvis Force |
1026 lbs. |
1339 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Neck Tension |
134 lbs. |
201 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Shoulder Deflection |
.71 in |
1.06 in |
Shoulder Force |
89 lbs. |
290 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |