In the past twenty years hundreds of infants and young children have died after being left in vehicles, usually by accident. When turning the vehicle off, drivers of the Seltos are reminded to check the back seat if they opened the rear door before starting out. The Taos doesn’t offer a back seat reminder.
The Seltos’ driver alert monitor detects an inattentive driver then sounds a warning and suggests a break. According to the NHTSA, drivers who fall asleep cause about 100,000 crashes and 1500 deaths a year. The Taos doesn’t offer a driver alert monitor.
Both the Seltos and the Taos have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, available all wheel drive, daytime running lights, blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Kia Seltos is safer than the Volkswagen Taos:
|
Seltos |
Taos |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
129 |
285 |
Neck Injury Risk |
24% |
32% |
Neck Stress |
237 lbs. |
413 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
23 lbs. |
28 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
Chest Compression |
.6 inches |
.7 inches |
Neck Injury Risk |
41% |
45% |
Neck Stress |
127 lbs. |
135 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
171 lbs. |
207 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
144/44 lbs. |
643/432 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Kia Seltos is safer than the Volkswagen Taos:
|
Seltos |
Taos |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
109 |
111 |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
234 |
393 |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
225 |
338 |
Spine Acceleration |
33 G’s |
46 G’s |
Hip Force |
433 lbs. |
939 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety rates the general design of front seat head restraints for their ability to protect front seat occupants from whiplash injuries. The IIHS also performs a dynamic test on those seats with “good” or “acceptable” geometry. In these ratings, the Seltos with standard seats is safer than the Taos:
|
Seltos |
Taos |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Head Restraint Design |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Distance from Back of Head |
22 mm |
38 mm |
Dynamic Test Rating |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Seat Design |
Pass |
Fail |
Torso Acceleration |
11.5 g’s |
13.3 g’s |
Neck Force Rating |
Low |
Low |
(Lower numerical results are better in all tests.)