Both the Trax and the CX-30 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, available blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.
Compare the2025 Chevrolet TraxVS 2024 Mazda CX-30
Safety
Warranty
The Trax’s corrosion warranty is 1 year longer than the CX-30’s (6 vs. 5 years).
There are over 5 times as many Chevrolet dealers as there are Mazda dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the Trax’s warranty.
Reliability
To reliably power the ignition and other systems and to recharge the battery, the Trax has a 130-amp alternator. The CX-30’s standard 100-amp alternator isn’t as powerful.
J.D. Power and Associates’ 2023 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Chevrolet vehicles are better in initial quality than Mazda vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Chevrolet above average in initial quality. With 37 more problems per 100 vehicles, Mazda is rated below average.
J.D. Power and Associates’ 2022 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Chevrolet vehicles are more reliable than Mazda vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Chevrolet above average in long-term dependability. With 21 more problems per 100 vehicles in the first three years of ownership, Mazda is rated lower.
Fuel Economy and Range
On the EPA test cycle the Trax gets better mileage than the CX-30:
|
|
|
MPG |
Trax |
|||
|
FWD |
1.2 turbo 3-cyl. |
28 city/32 hwy |
CX-30 |
|||
|
AWD |
2.5 turbo 4-cyl. |
22 city/30 hwy |
|
|
2.5 DOHC 4-cyl. |
26 city/33 hwy |
In heavy traffic or at stoplights the Trax’s engine automatically turns off when the vehicle is stopped, saving fuel and reducing pollution. The engine is automatically restarted when the driver gets ready to move again. If the conditions warrant or the driver wishes, the system can be manually disabled at any time for the duration of a trip. The CX-30 doesn’t offer an automatic engine start/stop system.
To lower fuel costs and make buying fuel easier, the Chevrolet Trax uses regular unleaded gasoline. The CX-30 with the 2.5 turbo 4-cylinder engine requires premium for maximum efficiency, which can cost on average about 82.8 cents more per gallon.
The Trax has a standard cap-less fueling system. The fuel filler is automatically opened when the fuel nozzle is inserted and automatically closed when it’s removed. This eliminates the need to unscrew and replace the cap and it reduces fuel evaporation, which causes pollution. The CX-30 doesn’t offer a cap-less fueling system.
Environmental Friendliness
In its Green Vehicle Guide, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rates the Chevrolet Trax higher (7 out of 10) than the Mazda CX-30 (5 to 7). This means the Trax produces up to 8 pounds less smog-producing pollutants than the CX-30 every 15,000 miles.
Brakes and Stopping
For better stopping power the Trax’s brake rotors are larger than those on the CX-30:
|
Trax |
CX-30 |
Front Rotors |
11.8 inches |
11.6 inches |
Rear Rotors |
11.3 inches |
10.4 inches |
The Trax stops shorter than the CX-30:
|
Trax |
CX-30 |
|
60 to 0 MPH |
116 feet |
125 feet |
Motor Trend |
60 to 0 MPH (Wet) |
138 feet |
147 feet |
Consumer Reports |
Tires and Wheels
For better traction, the Trax has larger standard tires than the CX-30 (225/60R17 vs. 215/65R16). The Trax RS’ optional tires are larger than the largest tires available on the CX-30 (245/45R19 vs. 215/65R16).
The Trax LS/LT’s standard tires provide better handling because they have a lower 60 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the CX-30 2.5 S’ standard 65 series tires. The Trax RS’ optional tires have a lower 45 series profile than the CX-30 Select/Preferred/Carbon/Premium’s 55 series tires.
For better ride, handling and brake cooling the Trax LS/LT has standard 17-inch wheels. Smaller 16-inch wheels are standard on the CX-30 2.5 S. The Trax RS’ optional 19-inch wheels are larger than the 18-inch wheels on the CX-30 Select/Preferred/Carbon/Premium.
The Trax has a standard easy tire fill system. When inflating the tires, the vehicle’s integrated tire pressure sensors keep track of the pressure as the tires fill and tell the driver when the tires are inflated to the proper pressure. The CX-30 doesn’t offer vehicle monitored tire inflation.
Suspension and Handling
For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Trax’s wheelbase is 1.9 inches longer than on the CX-30 (106.3 inches vs. 104.4 inches).
The Trax ACTIV handles at .81 G’s, while the CX-30 2.5 S Premium pulls only .79 G’s of cornering force in a Motor Trend skidpad test.
The Trax ACTIV executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver quicker than the CX-30 2.5 S Premium (27.5 seconds @ .62 average G’s vs. 27.9 seconds @ .6 average G’s).
Chassis
The Chevrolet Trax may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs about 350 to 450 pounds less than the Mazda CX-30.
The front grille of the Trax offers available electronically controlled shutters to close off airflow and reduce drag when less engine cooling is needed. This helps improve highway fuel economy. The CX-30 doesn’t offer active grille shutters.
The Trax uses computer-generated active noise cancellation to help remove annoying noise and vibration from the passenger compartment, especially at low frequencies. The CX-30 doesn’t offer active noise cancellation.
Passenger Space
The Trax has 3.9 cubic feet more passenger volume than the CX-30 (98 vs. 94.1).
The Trax has 1.5 inches more front headroom, .2 inches more front legroom, .1 inches more front shoulder room, 2.4 inches more rear legroom and .7 inches more rear shoulder room than the CX-30.
Cargo Capacity
The Trax has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat up than the CX-30 with its rear seat up (25.6 vs. 20.2 cubic feet). The Trax has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat folded than the CX-30 with its rear seat folded (54.1 vs. 45.2 cubic feet).
Towing
The Trax can be flat towed on all four wheels (dinghy towed), allowing recreational vehicle owners to bring it with them on the road. When they reach their destination, the Trax can be unhitched and driven around locally. The CX-30 can’t be towed flat on the ground.
Ergonomics
The Trax’s instruments include an oil pressure gauge and a temperature gauge - which could save your engine! Often ‘idiot lights’ don’t warn you until damage has been done. The CX-30 does not have an oil pressure gauge.
The power windows standard on both the Trax and the CX-30 have locks to prevent small children from operating them. When the lock on the Trax is engaged the driver can still operate all of the windows, for instance to close one opened by a child. The CX-30 prevents the driver from operating the other windows just as it does the other passengers.
In case you lock your keys in your vehicle, or don’t have them with you, you can let yourself in using the Trax’s available exterior PIN entry system. The CX-30 doesn’t offer an exterior PIN entry system.
To improve rear visibility by keeping the rear window clear, the Trax has a standard rear fixed intermittent wiper with a full on position. The rear wiper standard on the CX-30 only has an intermittent setting, so in a hard rain visibility isn’t as good.
Recommendations
The Trax was chosen as a Car and Driver’s “Top Ten” for 2024. The CX-30 has never been chosen by Car and Driver in their “10Best” issue.
The Chevrolet Trax outsold the Mazda CX-30 by 42% during 2023.