Compare the2024 Ford Mustang Mach-EVS 2024 Genesis GV60

The Mustang Mach-E has standard Post Collision Braking, which automatically apply the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The GV60 doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.

Both the Mustang Mach-E and the GV60 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning and driver alert monitors.

There are over 12 times as many Ford dealers as there are Genesis dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the Mustang Mach-E’s warranty.

The Mustang Mach-E has more powerful engines than the GV60:

On the EPA test cycle the Mustang Mach-E gets better mileage than the GV60:

The Mustang Mach-E can travel longer on a full charge than the GV60 on a full charge:

For better stopping power the Mustang Mach-E’s front brake rotors are larger than those on the GV60:

The Mustang Mach-E stops much shorter than the GV60:

For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Mustang Mach-E’s wheelbase is 3.3 inches longer than on the GV60 (117.5 inches vs. 114.2 inches).

The Mustang Mach-E GT handles at .92 G’s, while the GV60 Performance pulls only .83 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

The Mustang Mach-E GT executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 1 seconds quicker than the GV60 Performance (25.9 seconds @ .7 average G’s vs. 26.9 seconds @ .63 average G’s).

For better maneuverability, the Mustang Mach-E’s turning circle is 1.1 feet tighter than the GV60’s (38.1 feet vs. 39.2 feet).

The Ford Mustang Mach-E may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs up to about 300 pounds less than the Genesis GV60.

The front grille of the Mustang Mach-E uses electronically controlled shutters to close off airflow and reduce drag when less engine cooling is needed. This helps improve highway fuel economy. The GV60 doesn’t offer active grille shutters.

The Mustang Mach-E has 1 inch more front legroom, .1 inches more front shoulder room, .1 inches more rear headroom and .5 inches more rear legroom than the GV60.

The Mustang Mach-E has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat up than the GV60 with its rear seat up (29.7 vs. 24 cubic feet). The Mustang Mach-E has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat folded than the GV60 with its rear seat folded (59.7 vs. 54.7 cubic feet).

The Mustang Mach-E’s cargo area is larger than the GV60’s in almost every dimension:

In case you lock your keys in your vehicle, or don’t have them with you, you can let yourself in using the Mustang Mach-E’s exterior PIN entry system. The GV60 doesn’t offer an exterior PIN entry system, and its Connected Care can’t unlock the doors if the vehicle doesn’t have cell phone reception or the driver can’t contact the service.

To improve rear visibility by keeping the rear window clear, the Mustang Mach-E has a standard rear wiper. The GV60 doesn’t offer a rear wiper.

Consumer Reports rated the Mustang Mach-E’s headlight performance “Very Good,” a higher rating than the GV60’s headlights, which were rated “Good.”

Consumer Reports® recommends both the Ford Mustang Mach-E and the Genesis GV60, based on reliability, safety and performance.

A group of representative automotive journalists from North America selected the Mustang Mach-E as the 2021 North American Utility Vehicle of the Year. The GV60 has never been chosen.

The Ford Mustang Mach-E outsold the Genesis GV60 by almost 12 to one during 2023.