With its standard Smart Brake Support, the Mazda CX-90 is better at preventing collisions with pedestrians than the Ford Explorer, according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety:
|
|
CX-90 |
Explorer |
| Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
|
|
Crossing Child - DAY |
|
| 12 MPH |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 25 MPH |
-23 MPH |
-21 MPH |
|
|
Crossing Adult - NIGHT |
|
| 12 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 12 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
-17 MPH |
| 25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-2 MPH |
|
|
Parallel Adult - NIGHT |
|
| 25 MPH Brights |
AVOIDED |
AVOIDED |
| 25 MPH Low beams |
AVOIDED |
-20 MPH |
| 37 MPH Brights |
-33 MPH |
-22 MPH |
| Warning Issued-Brights |
2.4 sec |
1.3 sec |
| 37 MPH Low beams |
-26 MPH |
-14 MPH |
| Warning Issued-Low beams |
1.5 sec |
1.4 sec |
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the CX-90. But it costs extra on the Explorer.
Both the CX-90 and the Explorer have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, driver alert monitors and available around view monitors.

