Using vehicle speed sensors and seat sensors, smart airbags in the Passport deploy with different levels of force or don’t deploy at all to help better protect passengers of all sizes in different collisions. The Passport’s side airbags will shut off if a child is leaning against the door. The 4Runner’s side airbags don’t have smart features and will always deploy full force.
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the Passport. But it costs extra on the 4Runner.
For better protection of the passenger compartment, the Passport uses safety cell construction with a three-dimensional high-strength frame that surrounds the passenger compartment. It provides extra impact protection and a sturdy mounting location for door hardware and side impact beams. The 4Runner uses a body-on-frame design, which has no frame members above the floor of the vehicle.
Both the Passport and the 4Runner have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Honda Passport is safer than the Toyota 4Runner:
|
Passport |
4Runner |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
149 |
267 |
Neck Injury Risk |
28% |
47% |
Neck Stress |
189 lbs. |
438 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
36 lbs. |
54 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
46/243 lbs. |
488/468 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
3 Stars |
HIC |
216 |
367 |
Chest Compression |
.6 inches |
.7 inches |
Neck Injury Risk |
35% |
57% |
Neck Stress |
116 lbs. |
271 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
A significantly tougher test than their original offset frontal crash test, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety does 40 MPH small overlap frontal offset crash tests. In this test, where only 25% of the total width of the vehicle is struck, results indicate that the Honda Passport is safer than the 4Runner:
|
Passport |
4Runner |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
Restraints |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Neck Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Peak Head Forces |
0 G’s |
0 G’s |
Steering Column Movement Rearward |
0 cm |
12 cm |
Chest Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Hip & Thigh Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Femur Force R/L |
.1/.5 kN |
3.9/2.4 kN |
Hip & Thigh Injury Risk R/L |
0%/0% |
1%/0% |
Lower Leg Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Tibia index R/L |
.41/.41 |
.95/.85 |
Tibia forces R/L |
1.8/1.5 kN |
5/2.9 kN |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Honda Passport is safer than the Toyota 4Runner:
|
Passport |
4Runner |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Chest Movement |
.6 inches |
1.1 inches |
Abdominal Force |
101 lbs. |
179 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Hip Force |
304 lbs. |
381 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
15 inches |
20 inches |
HIC |
406 |
507 |
Hip Force |
838 lbs. |
895 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Instrumented handling tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and analysis of its dimensions indicate that the Passport, with its four-star roll-over rating, is 7.2% to 7.7% less likely to roll over than the 4Runner, which received a three-star rating.