Compare the2023 Mazda CX-9 VS 2023 Ford Explorer

To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the CX-9. But it costs extra on the Explorer.

Both the CX-9 and the Explorer have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, available around view monitors and driver alert monitors.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Mazda CX-9 is safer than the Ford Explorer:

	CX-9	Explorer
	Front Seat
STARS	5 Stars	5 Stars
Chest Movement	.4 inches	.9 inches
Abdominal Force	98 lbs.	161 lbs.
Hip Force	195 lbs.	224 lbs.
	Rear Seat
STARS	5 Stars	5 Stars
Hip Force	582 lbs.	604 lbs.
	Into Pole
STARS	5 Stars	5 Stars
HIC	249	288
Spine Acceleration	35 G’s	39 G’s
Hip Force	553 lbs.	573 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

For its top level performance in IIHS driver and passenger-side small overlap frontal, moderate overlap frontal, side impact, roof strength and head restraint tests, its standard front crash prevention system, and its headlight’s “Good” rating, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety grants the CX-9 its highest rating: “Top Safety Pick Plus” for 2019, a rating granted to only 134 vehicles tested by the IIHS. The Explorer is only a standard “Top Safety Pick” for 2019.

A reliable vehicle saves its owner time, money and trouble. Nobody wants to be stranded or have to be without a vehicle while it’s being repaired. Consumer Reports rates the CX-9’s reliability 41 points higher than the Explorer.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2022 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Mazda vehicles are more reliable than Ford vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Mazda above average in long-term dependability. With 13 more problems per 100 vehicles in the first three years of ownership, Ford is rated lower.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ January 2023 Auto Issue reports that Mazda vehicles are more reliable than Ford vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Mazda fourth in overall reliability. Ford is ranked 18th.

The CX-9’s 2.5 turbo 4-cylinder produces 10 lbs.-ft. more torque (320 vs. 310) than the Explorer’s standard 2.3 turbo 4-cylinder.

As tested in Motor Trend the Mazda CX-9 is faster than the Ford Explorer V6 hybrid gas:

	CX-9	Explorer
Zero to 60 MPH	7.1 sec	7.7 sec
Quarter Mile	15.5 sec	15.7 sec

On the EPA test cycle the CX-9 gets better mileage than the Explorer:

			MPG
CX-9
	AWD	2.5 turbo 4-cyl.	20 city/26 hwy
Explorer
	RWD	3.0 turbo V6	18 city/26 hwy
	AWD	3.0 turbo V6	18 city/24 hwy

To lower fuel costs and make buying fuel easier, the Mazda CX-9 uses regular unleaded gasoline (premium recommended for maximum performance). The Explorer ST/Platinum/King Ranch/Timberline requires premium, which can cost 20 to 55 cents more per gallon.

The CX-9 has 1.6 gallons more fuel capacity than the Explorer 2.3-liter’s standard fuel tank (19.5 vs. 17.9 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups.

The CX-9 stops shorter than the Explorer:

	CX-9	Explorer
60 to 0 MPH	121 feet	125 feet	Motor Trend

The CX-9 Touring’s standard tires provide better handling because they have a lower 60 series profile (height to width ratio) that provides a stiffer sidewall than the Explorer’s standard 65 series tires.

The CX-9 Signature handles at .85 G’s, while the Explorer XLT 4WD pulls only .81 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.

The CX-9 Signature executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 1.3 seconds quicker than the Explorer Limited 4WD (26.7 seconds @ .65 average G’s vs. 28 seconds @ .63 average G’s).

For greater off-road capability the CX-9 has greater minimum ground clearance than the Explorer ST (8.8 vs. 7.9 inches), allowing the CX-9 to travel over rougher terrain without being stopped or damaged. The CX-9’s minimum ground clearance is .1 inch higher than on the Explorer Timberline (8.8 vs. 8.7 inches).

As tested by Car and Driver, the interior of the CX-9 Signature is quieter than the Explorer ST 4WD:

	CX-9	Explorer
At idle	37 dB	41 dB
Full-Throttle	71 dB	77 dB
70 MPH Cruising	66 dB	67 dB

The CX-9’s standard towing capacity is much higher than the Explorer’s (3500 vs. 3000 pounds).

The CX-9 Grand Touring/Signature has a standard heads-up display that projects speed, tachometer, warning and navigation instruction readouts in front of the driver’s line of sight, allowing drivers to view information without diverting their eyes from the road. The Explorer doesn’t offer a heads-up display.

The CX-9’s front and rear power windows all open or close fully with one touch of the switches, making it more convenient at drive-up windows and toll booths, or when talking with someone outside the car. The Explorer’s rear power window switches have to be held the entire time to open or close them fully.

The CX-9 has a standard locking fuel door with a remote release located convenient to the driver. A locking fuel door helps prevent fuel theft and vandalism, such as sugar in the tank. A locking fuel door is only offered on the Explorer Hybrid.

The CX-9’s rain-sensitive wipers adjust their speed and turn on and off automatically based on the amount of rainfall on the windshield. This allows the driver to concentrate on driving without constantly adjusting the wipers. The Explorer’s standard intermittent wipers change speed with vehicle speed, but can’t turn on and off or change speed based on changing rainfall.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) conducts detailed tests on headlights for their range both straight ahead and in curves and to be certain they don’t exceed acceptable amounts of glare to oncoming drivers. The CX-9’s headlights were rated “Good” by the IIHS, while the Explorer’s headlights are rated “Acceptable.”

The CX-9’s standard outside mirrors include heating elements to clear off the mirrors for better visibility. Ford only offers heated mirrors on the Explorer XLT/Limited/ST-Line/Timberline/King Ranch/ST/Platinum.

To quickly and conveniently keep personal devices charged without cables tangling and wearing out, the Mazda CX-9 has a standard wireless phone charging system (Qi) in the center console. Wireless charging costs extra on the Explorer and isn’t available on the Explorer Base.

According to The Car Book by Jack Gillis, the CX-9 is less expensive to operate than the Explorer because it costs $118 less to do the manufacturer’s suggested maintenance for 50,000 miles. Typical repairs cost much less on the CX-9 than the Explorer, including $228 less for a muffler and $315 less for a power steering pump.

Consumer Reports® recommends the Mazda CX-9, based on reliability, safety and performance. The Ford Explorer isn't recommended.

Car and Driver performed a comparison test in its November 2019 issue and they ranked the Mazda CX-9 Signature higher than the Ford Explorer XLT 4WD.