For enhanced safety, the front and second-row seat shoulder belts of the Mercedes GLE have pretensioners to tighten the seatbelts and eliminate dangerous slack in the event of a collision and force limiters to limit the pressure the belts will exert on the passengers. The Mazda CX-9 doesn’t offer pretensioners for its second-row seat belts.
The GLE’s pre-crash front seatbelts will tighten automatically in the event the vehicle detects an impending crash, improving protection against injury significantly. The CX-9 doesn’t offer pre-crash pretensioners.
The Mercedes GLE has a standard driver’s side knee airbag mounted low on the dashboard. The knee airbag helps prevent the driver from sliding under the seatbelts or the main frontal airbag; this keeps the driver better positioned during a collision for maximum protection. A knee airbag also helps keep the legs from striking the dashboard, preventing knee and leg injuries in the case of a serious frontal collision. The CX-9 doesn’t offer knee airbags.
When descending a steep, off-road slope, the GLE’s standard Downhill Speed Regulation allows you to creep down safely. The CX-9 doesn’t offer Downhill Speed Regulation.
Compared to metal, the GLE’s plastic fuel tank can withstand harder, more intrusive impacts without leaking; this decreases the possibility of fire. The Mazda CX-9 has a metal gas tank.
Both the GLE and the CX-9 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning, available lane departure warning systems and around view monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Mercedes GLE is safer than the Mazda CX-9:
|
GLE |
CX-9 |
OVERALL STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
84 |
212 |
Neck Injury Risk |
24% |
26% |
Neck Stress |
208 lbs. |
309 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
17 lbs. |
51 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
301/184 lbs. |
107/424 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
209 |
337 |
Chest Compression |
.4 inches |
.6 inches |
Neck Injury Risk |
31% |
40% |
Neck Stress |
125 lbs. |
183 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
31 lbs. |
165 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Mercedes GLE is safer than the Mazda CX-9:
|
GLE |
CX-9 |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
40 |
88 |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
103 |
208 |
Spine Acceleration |
40 G’s |
54 G’s |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
12 inches |
15 inches |
Spine Acceleration |
35 G’s |
35 G’s |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.