© 1999 - 2024Advanta-STAR Automotive Research, all rights reserved. This vehicle comparison and all of the content in it are provided only by license from Advanta-STAR Automotive Research Corporation of America (“Advanta-STAR”). If you are not a legally licensed user of this vehicle comparison, it is against federal law to access it, copy it, forward it, or use it in any manner whatsoever. Any unauthorized use of this vehicle comparison is a violation of U.S. and international law and is punishable criminally and civilly. Removal of this watermark/notification without prior written license and approval received from Advanta-STAR is an agreement, understanding, and/or stipulation by the person(s), entities, agents, attorneys, and any other persons involved in the removal of this watermark/notification (including but not limited to Search Optics, LLC and any and all parent entities, sister entities, and subsidiary entities of Search Optics, LLC and/or any other entity, agent, attorney, and persons related in any manner to Search Optics, LLC) to: 1) an agreed upon amount of liquidated monetary damages of a minimum of $1,250,000.00 US Dollars in favor of Advanta-STAR; 2) the jurisdiction and enforcement of any legal claims associated with this matter asserted by Advanta-STAR in the United States Federal District Court in Portand, Oregon; and 3) service of process of any legal claims asserted by Advanta-STAR associated with this matter may be accomplished by First-Class Postage by the United States Postal Service or comparable service. XPYNN-M34HG 2a06:98c0:3600::103 2024/12/22
The front and rear suspension of the EQS uses air springs for a smoother, controlled ride than the LS, which uses coil springs. Air springs maintain proper ride height and ride more smoothly.
The EQS’ drift compensation steering can automatically compensate for road conditions which would cause the vehicle to drift from side to side, helping the driver to keep the vehicle straight more easily. The LS doesn’t offer drift compensation steering.
For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the EQS’ wheelbase is 3.4 inches longer than on the LS (126.4 inches vs. 123 inches).
For better handling and stability, the average track (width between the wheels) on the EQS is 1.5 inches wider in the front and 2 inches wider in the rear than the average track on the LS.
The EQS’ front to rear weight distribution is more even (50% to 50%) than the LS’ (53% to 47%). This gives the EQS more stable handling and braking.
The AMG EQS 4MATIC handles at .92 G’s, while the LS 500 AWD pulls only .83 G’s of cornering force in a Car and Driver skidpad test.
The EQS 580 4MATIC executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 1.8 seconds quicker than the LS 500h AWD (25.2 seconds @ .76 average G’s vs. 27 seconds @ .65 average G’s).
For better maneuverability, the EQS w/10° rear-wheel steering’s turning circle is 1 foot tighter than the LS’ (35.8 feet vs. 36.8 feet). The EQS’ turning circle is .4 feet tighter than the LS AWD’s (39 feet vs. 39.4 feet).