For enhanced safety, the front and rear seat shoulder belts of the Mazda CX-30 have pretensioners to tighten the seatbelts and eliminate dangerous slack in the event of a collision. The Toyota Corolla Hatchback doesn’t offer pretensioners for its rear seat belts.
The Mazda CX-30 has standard driver and front passenger side knee airbags mounted low on the dashboard. These airbags helps prevent the driver and front passenger from sliding under their seatbelts or the main frontal airbags; this keeps them better positioned during a collision for maximum protection. Knee airbags also help keep the legs from striking the dashboard, preventing knee and leg injuries in the case of a serious frontal collision. The Corolla Hatchback doesn’t offer a front passenger side knee airbag.
Over 200 people are killed each year when backed over by motor vehicles. The CX-30 Turbo Premium Plus has standard Rear Smart Brake Support that use rear sensors to monitor for objects to the rear and automatically apply the brakes to prevent a collision. The Corolla Hatchback doesn’t offer backup collision prevention brakes.
The CX-30 has all-wheel drive to maximize traction under poor conditions, especially in ice and snow. The Corolla Hatchback doesn’t offer all-wheel drive.
The CX-30 Turbo Premium Plus has a standard 360° View Monitor to allow the driver to see objects all around the vehicle on a screen. The Corolla Hatchback only offers a rear monitor.
Both the CX-30 and the Corolla Hatchback have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front and rear side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, driver alert monitors, available blind spot warning systems and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Mazda CX-30 is safer than the Toyota Corolla Hatchback:
|
CX-30 |
Corolla Hatchback |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
148 |
187 |
Neck Injury Risk |
26.7% |
27% |
Neck Stress |
216 lbs. |
243 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
18 lbs. |
50 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
201/172 lbs. |
330/310 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
179 |
356 |
Chest Compression |
.5 inches |
.6 inches |
Neck Compression |
85 lbs. |
86 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Mazda CX-30 is safer than the Toyota Corolla Hatchback:
|
CX-30 |
Corolla Hatchback |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
73 |
92 |
Hip Force |
275 lbs. |
330 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
178 |
239 |
Spine Acceleration |
30 G’s |
32 G’s |
Hip Force |
583 lbs. |
623 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Mazda CX-30 is safer than the Corolla Hatchback:
|
CX-30 |
Corolla Hatchback |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Structure |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
89 |
99 |
Neck Tension |
156 lbs. |
201 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
45 lbs. |
134 lbs. |
Torso |
ACCEPTABLE |
ACCEPTABLE |
Shoulder Deflection |
.87 in |
1.1 in |
Shoulder Force |
223 lbs. |
268 lbs. |
Torso Max Deflection |
1.54 in |
1.61 in |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
Pelvis Force |
759 lbs. |
1339 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Injury Criterion |
144 |
150 |
Neck Compression |
67 lbs. |
89 lbs. |
Torso |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Shoulder Deflection |
.94 in |
1.38 in |
Shoulder Force |
245 lbs. |
312 lbs. |
Torso Max Deflection |
.71 in |
1.1 in |
Pelvis |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Pelvis Force |
379 lbs. |
1026 lbs. |
Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |