The Gladiator offers optional Active Braking, which use forward mounted sensors to warn the driver of a possible collision ahead. If the driver doesn’t react and the system determines a collision is imminent, it automatically applies the brakes at full-force in order to reduce the force of the crash or avoid it altogether. The Colorado offers an available collision warning system without the automated brake feature that would prevent or reduce the collision if the driver fails to react.
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, Full-Time Four-Wheel Drive is standard on the Gladiator. But it costs extra on the Colorado.
To help make backing out of a parking space safer, the Gladiator’s optional rear cross-path warning system uses sensors in the rear bumper to alert the driver to vehicles approaching from the side, helping the driver avoid collisions. The Colorado doesn’t offer a cross-path warning system.
Both the Gladiator and the Colorado have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, rearview cameras, available daytime running lights, blind spot warning systems and rear parking sensors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Jeep Gladiator is safer than the Chevrolet Colorado:
|
|
Gladiator |
Colorado |
|
|
Passenger |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
| HIC |
180 |
309 |
| Neck Injury Risk |
30.1% |
44.9% |
| Neck Stress |
243 lbs. |
300 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

