The Rav4 has a standard Secondary Collision Brake, which automatically applies the brakes in the event of a crash to help prevent secondary collisions and prevent further injuries. The Mazda 3 doesn’t offer a post collision braking system: in the event of a collision that triggers the airbags, more collisions are possible without the protection of airbags that may have already deployed.
Both the Rav4 and the Mazda 3 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front and rear seatbelt pretensioners, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, driver alert monitors, available all wheel drive, blind spot warning systems, around view monitors and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH, results indicate that the Toyota Rav4 is safer than the Mazda 3:
|
Rav4 |
Mazda 3 |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
83 |
112 |
Chest Movement |
.5 inches |
.9 inches |
Abdominal Force |
138 lbs. |
238 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
146 |
371 |
Spine Acceleration |
49 G’s |
71 G’s |
Hip Force |
508 lbs. |
620 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.