Compare the2023 Audi Q4 e-tronVS 2023 Volvo C40 Recharge

Both the Q4 e-tron and the C40 Recharge have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, post-collision automatic braking systems, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning and available around view monitors.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2022 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Audi vehicles are better in initial quality than Volvo vehicles. With 17 fewer problems per 100 vehicles, JD Power ranks Audi higher than Volvo.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2022 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Audi vehicles are more reliable than Volvo With 24 fewer problems per 100 vehicles in the first three years of ownership, J.D. Power ranks Audi higher than Volvo.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ January 2021 Auto Issue reports that Audi vehicles are more reliable than Volvo vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Audi 4 places higher in reliability than Volvo.

On the EPA test cycle the Q4 e-tron gets better mileage than the C40 Recharge:

The Q4 e-tron can travel longer on a full charge than the C40 Recharge on a full charge:

For better stopping power the Q4 e-tron’s front brake rotors are larger than those on the C40 Recharge:

For better traction and acceleration, the Q4 e-tron has larger rear tires than the C40 Recharge (255/50R19 vs. 235/45R20).

The Q4 e-tron has standard front and rear gas-charged shocks for better control over choppy roads. The C40 Recharge’s suspension doesn’t offer gas-charged shocks.

The Q4 e-tron offers an optional or off-road. The C40 Recharge’s suspension doesn’t offer adjustable shock absorbers.

For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Q4 e-tron’s wheelbase is 2.3 inches longer than on the C40 Recharge (108.7 inches vs. 106.4 inches).

For better maneuverability, the Q4 e-tron 40’s turning circle is 3.9 feet tighter than the C40 Recharge’s (33.5 feet vs. 37.4 feet).

The Q4 e-tron has .3 inches more front legroom, 1.6 inches more rear headroom and 1.1 inches more rear legroom than the C40 Recharge.

The Q4 e-tron has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat up than the C40 Recharge with its rear seat up (24.8 vs. 17.3 cubic feet). The Q4 e-tron has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat folded than the C40 Recharge with its rear seat folded (53.1 vs. 48.7 cubic feet).

The Q4 e-tron’s standard towing capacity is much higher than the C40 Recharge’s (2205 vs. 2000 pounds). Maximum trailer towing in the Volvo C40 Recharge is only 2000 pounds. The Q4 e-tron offers up to a 2646 lbs. towing capacity.

J.D. Power and Associates surveys of service recipients show that Audi service is better than Volvo. J.D. Power ranks Audi 8th in service department satisfaction (above the industry average). With a 11% lower rating, Volvo is ranked 12th.

The Q4 e-tron offers an optional heads-up display that projects speed in front of the driver’s line of sight, allowing drivers to view information without diverting their eyes from the road. The C40 Recharge doesn’t offer a heads-up display.

To shield the driver and front passenger’s vision over a larger portion of the windshield and side windows, the Q4 e-tron has standard extendable sun visors. The C40 Recharge doesn’t offer extendable visors.

The Q4 e-tron Premium Plus/Prestige’s Park Steering Assist can parallel park or back into a parking spot by itself, with the driver only controlling speed with the brake pedal. The C40 Recharge doesn’t offer an automated parking system.

The Q4 e-tron is available in both rear-wheel drive and four-wheel drive configurations. The C40 Recharge doesn’t offer a two-wheel drive configuration.