For enhanced safety, the Chevrolet Traverse’s middle seat shoulder belts have child comfort guides to move the belt to properly fit children. A better fit can prevent injuries and the increased comfort also encourages children to buckle up. The Toyota 4Runner doesn’t offer comfort guides on its middle seat belts.
The Traverse has a standard front seat center airbag, which deploys between the driver and front passenger, protecting them from injuries caused by striking each other in serious side impacts. The 4Runner doesn’t offer front seat center airbags.
For better protection of the passenger compartment, the Traverse uses safety cell construction with a three-dimensional high-strength frame that surrounds the passenger compartment. It provides extra impact protection and a sturdy mounting location for door hardware and side impact beams. The 4Runner uses a body-on-frame design, which has no frame members above the floor of the vehicle.
Both the Traverse and the 4Runner have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, available all wheel drive, blind spot warning systems, around view monitors and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Chevrolet Traverse is safer than the Toyota 4Runner:
|
Traverse |
4Runner |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
216 |
267 |
Neck Injury Risk |
15.6% |
47% |
Neck Stress |
198 lbs. |
438 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
53/40 lbs. |
488/468 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
3 Stars |
HIC |
333 |
367 |
Neck Injury Risk |
35.2% |
57% |
Neck Stress |
128 lbs. |
271 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
51 lbs. |
58 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
258/133 lbs. |
453/353 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
A significantly tougher test than their original offset frontal crash test, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety does 40 MPH small overlap frontal offset crash tests. In this test, where only 25% of the total width of the vehicle is struck, results indicate that the Chevrolet Traverse is safer than the 4Runner:
|
Traverse |
4Runner |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
Restraints |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head Neck Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Head injury index |
61 |
142 |
Peak Head Forces |
0 G’s |
0 G’s |
Steering Column Movement Rearward |
3 cm |
12 cm |
Chest Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Max Chest Compression |
18 cm |
18 cm |
Hip & Thigh Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Femur Force R/L |
.5/0 kN |
3.9/2.4 kN |
Hip & Thigh Injury Risk R/L |
0%/0% |
1%/0% |
Lower Leg Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Tibia index R/L |
.74/.35 |
.95/.85 |
Tibia forces R/L |
1.4/0 kN |
5/2.9 kN |
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Chevrolet Traverse is safer than the Toyota 4Runner:
|
Traverse |
4Runner |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Chest Movement |
.9 inches |
1.1 inches |
Abdominal Force |
161 lbs. |
179 lbs. |
Hip Force |
204 lbs. |
233 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
14 inches |
20 inches |
HIC |
251 |
507 |
Spine Acceleration |
34 G’s |
43 G’s |
Hip Force |
554 lbs. |
895 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Instrumented handling tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and analysis of its dimensions indicate that the Traverse, with its four-star roll-over rating, is 7.7% to 9.6% less likely to roll over than the 4Runner, which received a three-star rating.