Compare the2023 Audi Q5VS 2022 Volvo XC60

To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the Q5. But it costs extra on the XC60.

Both the Q5 and the XC60 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, post-collision automatic braking systems, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras, rear cross-path warning and available around view monitors.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Audi Q5 is safer than the Volvo XC60:

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Audi Q5 is safer than the Volvo XC60:

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

For its top level performance in IIHS driver and passenger-side small overlap frontal, moderate overlap frontal, side impact, roof strength and head restraint tests, its standard front crash prevention system, and its headlight’s “Good” rating, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety grants the Q5 its highest rating: “Top Safety Pick Plus” for 2019, a rating granted to only 124 vehicles tested by the IIHS. The XC60 is only a standard “Top Safety Pick” for 2019.

The Audi Q5’s engines use a cast iron block for durability, while the XC60’s engines use an aluminum block. Aluminum engine blocks are much more prone to warp and crack at high temperatures than cast iron.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2022 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Audi vehicles are better in initial quality than Volvo vehicles. With 17 fewer problems per 100 vehicles, JD Power ranks Audi higher than Volvo.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2022 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Audi vehicles are more reliable than Volvo With 24 fewer problems per 100 vehicles in the first three years of ownership, J.D. Power ranks Audi higher than Volvo.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ January 2021 Auto Issue reports that Audi vehicles are more reliable than Volvo vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Audi 4 places higher in reliability than Volvo.

As tested in Car and Driver the Q5 55 TFSI e is faster than the XC60 B6 2.0 turbo/supercharged 4-cylinder:

On the EPA test cycle the Q5 55 TFSI e running on electricity gets better mileage than the XC60 T8 running on electricity (60 city/61 hwy vs. 59 city/55 hwy MPGe).

On the EPA test cycle the Q5 running its gasoline engine gets better mileage than the XC60 running its gasoline engine:

The Q5 55 TFSI e can travel with zero emissions on electricity, only, on a full charge for 22 miles. The XC60 T8 has to start its internal combustion engine after only 19 miles.

Both the Q5 and the XC60 have a standard automatic start/stop engine feature to stop unnecessary fuel waste and pollution at stoplights and heavy traffic. All Q5s have a standard disable switch for the system, so a driver can keep the engine from shutting off when the vehicle stops temporarily. The XC60 T8 doesn’t offer a way to disable start/stop.

To lower fuel costs and make buying fuel easier, the Audi Q5 uses regular unleaded gasoline (premium recommended for maximum performance). The XC60 requires premium, which can cost 20 to 55 cents more per gallon.

The Q5 offers a standard sequential manual gearbox (SMG). With no clutch pedal to worry about and a fully automatic mode, an SMG is much more efficient than a conventional automatic but just as easy to drive. The XC60 doesn’t offer an SMG or a conventional manual transmission.

The Q5’s launch control uses engine electronics to hold engine RPM’s precisely in order to provide the most stable and rapid acceleration possible, using all of the available traction. The XC60 doesn’t offer launch control.

For better stopping power the Q5’s standard brake rotors are larger than those on the XC60:

The Q5 stops shorter than the XC60:

The front and rear suspension of the Q5 uses coil springs for better ride, handling and control than the XC60, which uses transverse leafs springs in the rear. Coil springs compress more progressively and offer more suspension travel for a smoother ride with less bottoming out.

The Q5 has .5 inches more front headroom, .4 inches more rear headroom and .2 inches more rear shoulder room than the XC60.

For enhanced passenger comfort on long trips the Q5’s rear seats recline. The XC60’s rear seats don’t recline.

The front step up height for the Q5 is .7 inches lower than the XC60 (18.3” vs. 19”). The Q5’s rear step up height is 1.5 inches lower than the XC60’s (18” vs. 19.5”).

The Q5 has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat up than the XC60 with its rear seat up (25.8 vs. 21.6 cubic feet). The Q5 has a much larger cargo volume with its rear seat folded than the XC60 with its rear seat folded (54 vs. 49.8 cubic feet).

The Q5’s cargo area is larger than the XC60’s in almost every dimension:

Pulling a handle automatically lowers the Q5’s rear seats, to make changing between passengers and cargo easier. The XC60 doesn’t offer automatic folding seats.

The Q5’s standard towing capacity is much higher than the XC60’s (4400 vs. 3500 pounds).

The engine in the Q5 is mounted longitudinally (North-South), instead of sideways, as in the XC60. This makes it easier to service and maintain, because the accessory belts are in front.

J.D. Power and Associates surveys of service recipients show that Audi service is better than Volvo. J.D. Power ranks Audi 8th in service department satisfaction (above the industry average). With a 11% lower rating, Volvo is ranked 12th.

The Q5’s optional easy entry system raises the steering wheel when the door is unlocked or the ignition is switched off, making it easier for the driver to get in and out. The XC60 doesn’t offer an easy entry system.

The Q5’s front and rear power windows all open or close fully with one touch of the switches, making it more convenient at drive-up windows and toll booths, or when talking with someone outside the car. The XC60’s rear power window switches have to be held the entire time to open or close them fully.

Heated windshield washer nozzles are standard on the Q5 to prevent washer fluid and nozzles from freezing and help continue to keep the windshield clear in sub-freezing temperatures. Heated windshield washer nozzles cost extra on the XC60.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) conducts detailed tests on headlights for their range both straight ahead and in curves and to be certain they don’t exceed acceptable amounts of glare to oncoming drivers. The Q5’s headlights were rated “Good” to “Acceptable” by the IIHS, while the XC60’s headlights are rated “Acceptable.”

To shield the driver and front passenger’s vision over a larger portion of the windshield and side windows, the Q5 has standard extendable sun visors. The XC60 doesn’t offer extendable visors.

Manual rear side window sunshades are available in the Q5 to help block heat and glare for the rear passengers. The XC60 doesn’t offer rear side window sunshades.

Insurance will cost less for the Q5 owner. The Car Book by Jack Gillis rates the Q5 with a number “5” insurance rate while the XC60 is rated higher at a number “10” rate.

According to The Car Book by Jack Gillis, the Q5 is less expensive to operate than the XC60 because typical repairs cost much less on the Q5 than the XC60, including $24 less for front brake pads and $272 less for a fuel pump.

Consumer Reports® recommends the Audi Q5, based on reliability, safety and performance. The Volvo XC60 isn't recommended.

The Audi Q5/SQ5 outsold the Volvo XC60 by 64% during the 2021 model year.