The Charger GT/SXT AWD offers all-wheel drive to maximize traction under poor conditions, especially in ice and snow. The Avalon doesn’t offer all-wheel drive.
Both the Charger and the Avalon have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, daytime running lights, rearview cameras, available crash mitigating brakes, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Dodge Charger is safer than the Toyota Avalon:
|
Charger |
Avalon |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
95 |
162 |
Neck Injury Risk |
26% |
35% |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
582/440 lbs. |
499/567 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
96 |
302 |
Chest Compression |
.7 inches |
.8 inches |
Neck Stress |
155 lbs. |
180 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
42 lbs. |
64 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
267/469 lbs. |
447/453 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Dodge Charger is safer than the Toyota Avalon:
|
Charger |
Avalon |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
164 |
266 |
Hip Force |
243 lbs. |
686 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Hip Force |
692 lbs. |
719 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.