The 300 offers all-wheel drive to maximize traction under poor conditions, especially in ice and snow. The Avalon doesn’t offer all-wheel drive.
Both the 300 and the Avalon have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, daytime running lights, rearview cameras, available crash mitigating brakes, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Chrysler 300 is safer than the Toyota Avalon:
|
300 |
Avalon |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
131 |
162 |
Neck Injury Risk |
31% |
35% |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
203 |
302 |
Neck Stress |
143 lbs. |
180 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH, results indicate that the Chrysler 300 is safer than the Toyota Avalon:
|
300 |
Avalon |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
134 |
266 |
Hip Force |
350 lbs. |
686 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.