Both the Veloster and the Mustang have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rearview cameras and rear cross-path warning.
A significantly tougher test than their original offset frontal crash test, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety does 40 MPH small overlap frontal offset crash tests. In this test, where only 25% of the total width of the vehicle is struck, results indicate that the Hyundai Veloster is safer than the Mustang Fastback:
|
Veloster |
Mustang |
Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Restraints |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
Head Neck Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Peak Head Forces |
0 G’s |
0 G’s |
Steering Column Movement Rearward |
1 cm |
5 cm |
Chest Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Max Chest Compression |
23 cm |
25 cm |
Hip & Thigh Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Femur Force R/L |
.6/.2 kN |
2.8/1.4 kN |
Hip & Thigh Injury Risk R/L |
0%/0% |
0%/0% |
Lower Leg Evaluation |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Tibia index R/L |
.42/.62 |
.74/.66 |
Tibia forces R/L |
3.1/.5 kN |
3.3/2.5 kN |
For its top level performance in IIHS driver-side small overlap frontal, moderate overlap frontal, side impact, rear impact and roof-crush tests, its standard front crash prevention system, its “Good” rating in the new passenger-side small overlap crash test, and its headlight’s “Acceptable” rating, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety grants the Veloster the rating of “Top Safety Pick” for 2019, a rating granted to only 164 vehicles tested by the IIHS. The Mustang was not even a standard “Top Safety Pick” for 2016.