For enhanced safety, the front and middle seat shoulder belts of the Chrysler Voyager are height-adjustable to accommodate a wide variety of driver and passenger heights. A better fit can prevent injuries and the increased comfort also encourages passengers to buckle up. The Mazda CX-9 doesn’t offer height-adjustable middle seat belts.
The Chrysler Voyager has standard driver and front passenger side knee airbags mounted low on the dashboard. These airbags helps prevent the driver and front passenger from sliding under their seatbelts or the main frontal airbags; this keeps them better positioned during a collision for maximum protection. Knee airbags also help keep the legs from striking the dashboard, preventing knee and leg injuries in the case of a serious frontal collision. The CX-9 doesn’t offer knee airbags.
Compared to metal, the Voyager’s plastic fuel tank can withstand harder, more intrusive impacts without leaking; this decreases the possibility of fire. The Mazda CX-9 has a metal gas tank.
Both the Voyager and the CX-9 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, daytime running lights, rearview cameras, available crash mitigating brakes, blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Chrysler Voyager is safer than the Mazda CX-9:
|
Voyager |
CX-9 |
OVERALL STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
168 |
212 |
Neck Stress |
230 lbs. |
309 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
75/194 lbs. |
107/424 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
196 |
337 |
Chest Compression |
.4 inches |
.6 inches |
Neck Injury Risk |
25% |
40% |
Neck Stress |
117 lbs. |
183 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
51 lbs. |
165 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
440/251 lbs. |
376/375 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Chrysler Voyager is safer than the Mazda CX-9:
|
Voyager |
CX-9 |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
72 |
88 |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
66 |
208 |
Spine Acceleration |
54 G’s |
54 G’s |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
13 inches |
15 inches |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Instrumented handling tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and analysis of its dimensions indicate that the Voyager is 3.5% to 4.3% less likely to roll over than the CX-9.