The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety tests front crash prevention systems. With a score of 6 points, IIHS rates the frontal crash prevention system optional in the Wrangler as “Superior.” The 4Runner scores zero, and is rated by the IIHS as having no effective frontal crash prevention.
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, Full-Time Four-Wheel Drive is standard on the Wrangler. But it costs extra on the 4Runner.
Both the Wrangler and the 4Runner have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, rearview cameras, available daytime running lights, blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Jeep Wrangler is safer than the Toyota 4Runner:
|
|
Wrangler |
4Runner |
|
|
Driver |
|
| STARS |
4 Stars |
4 Stars |
| HIC |
187 |
267 |
| Neck Injury Risk |
31% |
47% |
| Neck Stress |
299 lbs. |
438 lbs. |
|
|
Passenger |
|
| STARS |
4 Stars |
3 Stars |
| HIC |
202 |
367 |
| Chest Compression |
.6 inches |
.7 inches |
| Neck Injury Risk |
31.1% |
57% |
| Neck Stress |
188 lbs. |
271 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

