Using vehicle speed sensors and seat sensors, smart airbags in the Accord deploy with different levels of force or don’t deploy at all to help better protect passengers of all sizes in different collisions. The Accord’s side airbags will shut off if a child is leaning against the door. The Avalon’s airbags don’t have smart features and will always deploy full force.
The Accord’s driver alert monitor detects an inattentive driver then sounds a warning and suggests a break. According to the NHTSA, drivers who fall asleep cause about 100,000 crashes and 1500 deaths a year. The Avalon doesn’t offer a driver alert monitor.
Both the Accord and the Avalon have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, plastic fuel tanks, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, available blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Honda Accord is safer than the Toyota Avalon:
|
Accord |
Avalon |
OVERALL STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
|
Driver |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
Neck Injury Risk |
23% |
35% |
Neck Stress |
184 lbs. |
220 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
231/338 lbs. |
499/567 lbs. |
|
Passenger |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
4 Stars |
HIC |
266 |
302 |
Chest Compression |
.4 inches |
.8 inches |
Neck Stress |
140 lbs. |
180 lbs. |
Neck Compression |
54 lbs. |
64 lbs. |
Leg Forces (l/r) |
378/216 lbs. |
447/453 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Honda Accord is safer than the Toyota Avalon:
|
Accord |
Avalon |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
140 |
163 |
Chest Movement |
.8 inches |
.8 inches |
Abdominal Force |
152 G’s |
156 G’s |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Hip Force |
428 lbs. |
686 lbs. |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
242 |
267 |
Spine Acceleration |
34 G’s |
38 G’s |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Instrumented handling tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and analysis of its dimensions indicate that the Accord, with its five-star roll-over rating, is 1.2% less likely to roll over than the Avalon, which received a four-star rating.
For its top level performance in IIHS driver and passenger-side small overlap frontal, moderate overlap frontal, side impact, roof strength and head restraint tests, its standard vehicle-to-vehicle front crash prevention system, its standard vehicle-to-pedestrian front crash prevention system, and its standard headlight’s “Good” rating, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety grants the Accord its highest rating: “Top Pick Plus” for 2021, a rating granted to only 74 vehicles tested by the IIHS. The Avalon has not been fully tested, yet.