Compare the2022 Dodge ChallengerVS 2021 Mercedes AMG E-Class Coupe

The Challenger has standard Active Head Restraints, which use a specially designed headrest to protect the driver and front passenger from whiplash. During a rear-end collision, the Active Head Restraints system moves the headrests forward to prevent neck and spine injuries. The AMG E-Class Coupe doesn’t offer a whiplash protection system.

Both the Challenger and the AMG E-Class Coupe have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, daytime running lights, rearview cameras, available all wheel drive, collision warning systems, blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.

Dodge’s powertrain warranty covers the Challenger 1 year and 10,000 miles longer than Mercedes covers the AMG E-Class Coupe. Any repair needed on the engine, transmission, axles, joints or driveshafts is fully covered for 5 years or 60,000 miles. Coverage on the AMG E-Class Coupe ends after only 4 years or 50,000 miles.

There are over 6 times as many Dodge dealers as there are Mercedes dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the Challenger’s warranty.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2021 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Dodge vehicles are better in initial quality than Mercedes vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Dodge second in initial quality, above the industry average. With 54 more problems per 100 vehicles, Mercedes is ranked 25th, below the industry average.

From surveys of all its subscribers, Consumer Reports’ January 2021 Auto Issue reports that Dodge vehicles are more reliable than Mercedes vehicles. Consumer Reports ranks Dodge 10 places higher in reliability than Mercedes.

The Challenger R/T automatic’s standard 5.7 V8 produces 16 lbs.-ft. more torque (400 vs. 384) than the AMG E-Class Coupe’s 3.0 turbo 6-cylinder hybrid. The Challenger R/T manual’s standard 5.7 V8 produces 26 lbs.-ft. more torque (410 vs. 384) than the AMG E-Class Coupe’s 3.0 turbo 6-cylinder hybrid. The Challenger R/T Scat Pack’s standard 6.4 V8 produces 56 more horsepower (485 vs. 429) and 91 lbs.-ft. more torque (475 vs. 384) than the AMG E-Class Coupe’s 3.0 turbo 6-cylinder hybrid. The Challenger SRT Super Stock’s standard 6.2 supercharged V8 produces 378 more horsepower (807 vs. 429) and 323 lbs.-ft. more torque (707 vs. 384) than the AMG E-Class Coupe’s 3.0 turbo 6-cylinder hybrid.

As tested in Motor Trend the Challenger SRT Hellcat 6.2 supercharged V8 is faster than the Mercedes AMG E-Class Coupe (automatics tested):

An engine control system that can shut down some of the engine’s cylinders helps improve the Challenger 5.7/6.4 V8 Auto’s fuel efficiency. The AMG E-Class Coupe doesn’t offer a system that can shut down part of the engine.

The Challenger has 1.1 gallons more fuel capacity than the AMG E-Class Coupe (18.5 vs. 17.4 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups.

The Challenger offers a manual transmission for better acceleration, control and sportiness. The AMG E-Class Coupe doesn’t offer a manual transmission.

The Challenger R/T Scat Pack/Hellcat/Super Stock’s launch control uses engine electronics to hold engine RPM’s precisely in order to provide the most stable and rapid acceleration possible, using all of the available traction. The AMG E-Class Coupe doesn’t offer launch control.

For better stopping power the Challenger Hellcat/Redeye’s front brake rotors are larger than those on the AMG E-Class Coupe:

The Challenger stops much shorter than the AMG E-Class Coupe:

For better traction, the Challenger SRT Super Stock’s tires are larger than the largest tires available on the AMG E-Class Coupe (315/40R18 vs. 245/40R19).

The Challenger has a standard space-saver spare (not available on R/T Scat Pack/Hellcat/Super Stock) so you can replace a flat tire and drive to have the flat repaired or replaced. A spare tire isn’t available on the AMG E-Class Coupe; it requires you to depend on its run-flat tires, which limits mileage and speed before they are repaired. If a run-flat is damaged beyond repair by a road hazard your vehicle will have to be towed. Some tire options on the AMG E-Class Coupe don’t have a run-flat feature, either.

For a smoother ride and more stable handling, the Challenger’s wheelbase is 2.9 inches longer than on the AMG E-Class Coupe (116 inches vs. 113.1 inches).

For better handling and stability, the average track (width between the wheels) on the Challenger is .2 inches wider in the front and 1.6 inches wider in the rear than the track on the AMG E-Class Coupe.

The SRT Hellcat Redeye handles at .96 G’s, while the AMG E 53 Coupe pulls only .91 G’s of cornering force in a Motor Trend skidpad test.

The SRT Widebody Hellcat Redeye executes Motor Trend’s “Figure Eight” maneuver 1 seconds quicker than the AMG E 53 Coupe (24.3 seconds @ .82 average G’s vs. 25.3 seconds @ .74 average G’s).

For better maneuverability, the Challenger SXT/R/T’s turning circle is 2.3 feet tighter than the AMG E-Class Coupe’s (37.4 feet vs. 39.7 feet). The Challenger Supercharged/Widebody’s turning circle is 1 foot tighter than the AMG E-Class Coupe’s (38.7 feet vs. 39.7 feet).

The Dodge Challenger may be more efficient, handle and accelerate better because it weighs up to about 600 pounds less than the Mercedes AMG E-Class Coupe.

Because it has more passenger and cargo room, the EPA rates the Challenger a Compact car, while the AMG E-Class Coupe is rated a Subcompact.

The Challenger has standard seating for 5 passengers; the AMG E-Class Coupe can only carry 4.

The Challenger has 4.7 cubic feet more passenger volume than the AMG E-Class Coupe (93.7 vs. 89).

The Challenger has 1.6 inches more front headroom, .1 inches more front legroom, 2.4 inches more front shoulder room, .7 inches more rear headroom and 3.6 inches more rear shoulder room than the AMG E-Class Coupe.

The Challenger has a much larger trunk than the AMG E-Class Coupe (16.2 vs. 10 cubic feet).

The Challenger’s instruments include an oil pressure gauge and a temperature gauge - which could save your engine! Often ‘idiot lights’ don’t warn you until damage has been done. The AMG E-Class Coupe does not have an oil pressure gauge.

The Challenger is available in both rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations. The AMG E-Class Coupe doesn’t offer a two-wheel drive configuration.

Insurance will cost less for the Challenger owner. The Car Book by Jack Gillis rates the Challenger with a number “1” insurance rate while the AMG E-Class Coupe is rated higher at a number “5” rate.

The Challenger will cost the buyer less in the long run because of its superior resale value. The IntelliChoice estimates that the Challenger will retain 48.56% to 60.44% of its original price after five years, while the AMG E-Class Coupe only retains 41.18%.

According to The Car Book by Jack Gillis, the Challenger is less expensive to operate than the AMG E-Class Coupe because it costs $391 less to do the manufacturer’s suggested maintenance for 50,000 miles. Typical repairs cost much less on the Challenger than the AMG E-Class Coupe, including $510 less for a water pump, $171 less for a muffler, $578 less for a starter, $320 less for fuel injection, $48 less for front struts and $482 less for a timing belt/chain.

IntelliChoice estimates that five-year ownership costs (depreciation, financing, insurance, fuel, fees, repairs and maintenance) for the Dodge Challenger will be $456 to $48762 less than for the Mercedes AMG E-Class Coupe.

Consumer Reports® recommends the Dodge Challenger, based on reliability, safety and performance.