For enhanced safety, the front and rear seat shoulder belts of the Subaru Outback have pretensioners to tighten the seatbelts and eliminate dangerous slack in the event of a collision and force limiters to limit the pressure the belts will exert on the passengers. The Nissan Murano doesn’t offer pretensioners for the rear seat belts.
To provide maximum traction and stability on all roads, All-Wheel Drive is standard on the Outback. But it costs extra on the Murano.
When descending a steep, off-road slope, the Outback’s standard Hill Descent Control allows you to creep down safely. The Murano doesn’t offer Hill Descent Control.
Both the Outback and the Murano have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, available blind spot warning systems, rear cross-path warning and driver alert monitors.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Subaru Outback is safer than the Nissan Murano:
|
Outback |
Murano |
|
Front Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
28 |
101 |
Chest Movement |
.5 inches |
.9 inches |
Abdominal Force |
101 G’s |
102 G’s |
Hip Force |
247 lbs. |
392 lbs. |
|
Rear Seat |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
HIC |
116 |
148 |
|
Into Pole |
|
STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
Max Damage Depth |
14 inches |
17 inches |
HIC |
146 |
439 |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.