Lithia Auto Stores

Compare the2022 Chevrolet TraxVS 2021 Mazda CX-30

2022 Chevrolet Trax
2021 Mazda CX-30

Safety

Both the Trax and the CX-30 have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front seatbelt pretensioners, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, daytime running lights, rearview cameras, available all wheel drive, blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Chevrolet Trax is safer than the Mazda CX-30:

Trax

CX-30

Driver

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

122

148

Neck Injury Risk

26%

26.7%

Neck Compression

12 lbs.

18 lbs.

Passenger

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

Chest Compression

.3 inches

.5 inches

Neck Stress

122 lbs.

172 lbs.

Leg Forces (l/r)

249/289 lbs.

380/386 lbs.

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH, results indicate that the Chevrolet Trax is safer than the Mazda CX-30:

Trax

CX-30

Front Seat

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

73

73

Chest Movement

.7 inches

1 inches

Abdominal Force

120 lbs.

209 lbs.

Rear Seat

STARS

5 Stars

5 Stars

HIC

100

197

Spine Acceleration

33 G’s

60 G’s

New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.

Warranty

The Trax’s corrosion warranty is 1 year longer than the CX-30’s (6 vs. 5 years).

There are over 5 times as many Chevrolet dealers as there are Mazda dealers, which makes it much easier should you ever need service under the Trax’s warranty.

Reliability

J.D. Power and Associates rated the Trax third among small suvs in their 2021 Initial Quality Study. The CX-30 isn’t in the top three in its category.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2021 Initial Quality Study of new car owners surveyed provide the statistics that show that Chevrolet vehicles are better in initial quality than Mazda vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Chevrolet 10th in initial quality, above the industry average. With 26 more problems per 100 vehicles, Mazda is ranked 23rd, below the industry average.

J.D. Power and Associates’ 2021 survey of the owners of three-year-old vehicles provides the long-term dependability statistics that show that Chevrolet vehicles are more reliable than Mazda vehicles. J.D. Power ranks Chevrolet 12th in reliability, above the industry average. With 6 more problems per 100 vehicles, Mazda is ranked 14th.

Fuel Economy and Range

On the EPA test cycle the Trax AWD gets better fuel mileage than the CX-30 2.5 turbo 4-cylinder AWD (23 city/30 hwy vs. 22 city/30 hwy).

To lower fuel costs and make buying fuel easier, the Chevrolet Trax uses regular unleaded gasoline. The CX-30 with the 2.5 turbo 4-cylinder engine requires premium for maximum efficiency, which can cost 20 to 55 cents more per gallon.

The Trax has 1.3 gallons more fuel capacity than the CX-30 AWD’s standard fuel tank (14 vs. 12.7 gallons), for longer range between fill-ups.

Environmental Friendliness

In its Green Vehicle Guide, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) rates the Chevrolet Trax higher (7 out of 10) than the Mazda CX-30 (5 to 7). This means the Trax produces up to 8 pounds less smog-producing pollutants than the CX-30 every 15,000 miles.

Brakes and Stopping

For better stopping power the Trax’s front brake rotors are larger than those on the CX-30:

Trax

CX-30

Front Rotors

11.8 inches

11.6 inches

The Trax stops much shorter than the CX-30:

Trax

CX-30

70 to 0 MPH

166 feet

177 feet

Car and Driver

60 to 0 MPH

113 feet

125 feet

Motor Trend

60 to 0 MPH (Wet)

141 feet

147 feet

Consumer Reports

Suspension and Handling

The Trax has standard front and rear gas-charged shocks for better control over choppy roads. The CX-30’s suspension doesn’t offer gas-charged shocks.

The Trax handles at .80 G’s, while the CX-30 Premium AWD pulls only .79 G’s of cornering force in a Motor Trend skidpad test.

Chassis

The Trax is 5.4 inches shorter than the CX-30, making the Trax easier to handle, maneuver and park in tight spaces.

Passenger Space

The Trax has 1.5 inches more front headroom and .5 inches more rear headroom than the CX-30.

Cargo Capacity

The Trax has a larger cargo volume with its rear seat folded than the CX-30 with its rear seat folded (48.4 vs. 45.2 cubic feet).

Ergonomics

The power windows standard on both the Trax and the CX-30 have locks to prevent small children from operating them. When the lock on the Trax is engaged the driver can still operate all of the windows, for instance to close one opened by a child. The CX-30 prevents the driver from operating the other windows just as it does the other passengers.

To improve rear visibility by keeping the rear window clear, the Trax has a standard rear fixed intermittent wiper with a full on position. The rear wiper standard on the CX-30 only has an intermittent setting, so in a hard rain visibility isn’t as good.

The Trax LT’s standard outside mirrors include heating elements to clear off the mirrors for better visibility. The CX-30 doesn’t offer heated side mirrors.

The Trax LT has a 115-volt a/c outlet on the center console, allowing you to recharge a laptop or run small household appliances without special adapters that can break or get misplaced. The CX-30 doesn’t offer a house-current electrical outlet.

Recommendations

The Car Book by Jack Gillis recommends the Chevrolet Trax, based on economy, maintenance, safety and complaint levels.

The Chevrolet Trax outsold the Mazda CX-30 by 17% during the 2021 model year.

Lithia Auto Stores

© 1999 - 2026 Advanta-STAR Automotive Research. All rights reserved.

Powered by Lithia